AgriFood-WP 2017:1

Evaluation of results and adaptation of EU Rural Development Programmes

The EU Commission highlights evaluations as important for improving common policies. But do evaluations actually contribute? This paper examines whether this has been the case for the EU Rural Development Programmes (RDPs). We investigate 1) to what extent evaluations have influenced the design of national programmes and 2) if they have affected the Rural Development Regulation on which national programmes are based.

Our main finding is that evaluations do not seem to affect future policy to any discernible degree. This is the case for both national programmes and the Regulation itself, which seems to have evolved in response to external pressures. Partly, this may be because evaluations tend to give vague or too general recommendations. Moreover, evaluations seldom apply counterfactual analysis, often because of a lack of data, implying that results may be methodologically questioned. Lastly, evaluations, and RDPs, are hard to locate and seldom translated from their native languages, impairing the possibilities of learning from the experiences of others.

För en kortfattad version på svenska, se AgriFood Policy Brief 2017:1

Liknande publikationer

AgriFood Policy Brief 2021:3
Att se skogens alla värden – en samhällsekonomisk analys
AgriFood Policy Brief 2021:1
Finns det ett samband mellan yrkesfiske och turism?
AgriFood Rapport 2020:2
Att leva i land och stad - ett djupare perspektiv på inkomstfördelning